Ana sayfa
Forumlar
Yeni mesajlar
Forumlarda ara
Blog
Neler yeni
Yeni mesajlar
Son aktiviteler
Giriş yap
Kayıt ol
Neler yeni
Ara
Ara
Sadece başlıkları ara
Kullanıcı:
Yeni mesajlar
Forumlarda ara
Menü
Giriş yap
Kayıt ol
Install the app
Yükle
Forumlar
Islamic Forum in Different Languages
English Islamic Forum
The Prophet Mohammad (pbuh)
As a Human Prophet Muhammad ( p.b.u.h )
JavaScript devre dışı. Daha iyi bir deneyim için, önce lütfen tarayıcınızda JavaScript'i etkinleştirin.
Çok eski bir web tarayıcısı kullanıyorsunuz. Bu veya diğer siteleri görüntülemekte sorunlar yaşayabilirsiniz..
Tarayıcınızı güncellemeli veya
alternatif bir tarayıcı
kullanmalısınız.
Konuya cevap cer
Mesaj
<blockquote data-quote="genc_kalem" data-source="post: 180637" data-attributes="member: 15919"><p><strong>The ideal human type in a society of ignorance: Muhammad al-amin</strong></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 18px"><span style="color: red"><strong>THE IDEAL HUMAN TYPE IN A SOCIETY OF IGNORANCE: MUHAMMAD AL-AMIN </strong></span></span></span></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="color: #666666"><strong><span style="color: teal">Ali Murat Daryal, PhD</span></strong> </span> </span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px"><img src="http://www.lastprophet.info/en/images/stories/kimdir/daryal_150.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">After Muhammad (pbuh) became an active member of the society where he passed his childhood, he began to be uncertain about everything in the society. These doubts prevented him from accepting all the customs and behavior in that society which had been passed down from generation to generation and applying them in his own life. In this situation Muhammad adopted an attitude of organizing his life according to the truths he had discovered through common sense and intuition and to develop relationships with others along these same lines. This action and behavior of his were the first propagation of Islam not officially based on revelation. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">Of course, it could not be expected that this action and behavior would have an impact on the dominant patterns of behavior accustomed to in the society. However, it would not be reflecting reality to say that there was no influence at all on the patterns of behavior that had been followed until that time. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">The behavior Muhammad displayed in front of everyone brought new dimensions to such concepts as “life, man, freedom, rights, justice, equality, truthfulness and work.” It inspired new ideas in their minds regarding how some other similar concepts could, in fact, should be understood. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">Muhammad joined society as one of its members. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">However, the people in society at that time were extremely determined to adhere to the patterns of behavior they had inherited from their fathers and grandfathers and to share and live their values. They had an uncompromising stance on the transmission of these to their children. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">In spite of all this, the people used the attribute <em>“amin”</em> for Muhammad, who did not accept their actions and behavior, did not share their values, and, to the contrary, suggested new values; they called him “<strong>Muhammadul-Amin.</strong>” </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">However, we would expect that these people would give this attribute to someone who had best represented them by taking a non-compromising attitude regarding their actions and behavior, sharing and perpetuating their values and having the determination to transmit them to future generations. The fact that they saw someone who rejected their values and brought new ones to society as worthy of this attribute instead of someone who shared their values and spent his life to protect them is a matter that needs to be dwelt upon carefully. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">Muhammad was an orphan. He had no authority behind him. But still the society called him <em>“Amin.”</em> </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">The wealthy thought of this term in respect to trade. They understood that Muhammad was extremely trustworthy in trade and other financial relationships. For this reason, they called him <em>“Amin.”</em> </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">The nobility were concerned about their honor and dignity. They understood from this term that Muhammad would respect their honor, dignity, and prestige. By using <em>“Amin”</em> they wanted to show that he would not damage their honor by means of lying, slander, falsehood and gossip. </span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">Those in governing positions in society –from the nobility, of course- gave this term a different meaning. They saw his existence as a guarantee against friction among classes and conflict among tribes. With this term, they wanted to show that they did not nurture doubts about his role as mediator and judge in society and his positive attitude regarding events. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">Fighters and warriors naturally gave a different meaning and interpretation to this term. With this name, they understood that Muhammad was reliable in battle and that he would not abandon the battle lines under any circumstances that might appear. They wanted to demonstrate this to everyone –friends and foes alike. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">The socially, economically and physically weak gave a meaning to this term appropriate to themselves. They gave it dimensions according to their own state and conditions. They wanted to show that they had no doubt about his ability to help them in every possible way when they came to him for financial aid and other needs and, in fact, that they believed he would ask for help from friends and serve as guarantor for it. The poor looked at this name from their own perspective of helplessness. These people wanted to demonstrate with the term “Amin” that they believed and felt certain when they encountered oppression, regardless of from whom, that Muhammad would protect their rights under all circumstances. Orphans wanted to make clear that when they sought his protection, they were sure he would open his arms to them as a brother or father and that they would live without fear because of him. In a world where everyone beat, cursed and looked down upon them, slaves understood by this name that he would not beat, curse, look down upon or speak badly to them. They wanted to explain their belief that in a society where no one considered them as human beings, he saw each of them as an honorable person and would treat them accordingly. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">Rightly so, these people could only have been expected to describe someone as <em>“Amin”</em> who had a lifestyle like their fathers and grandfathers and themselves and who drank alcohol, gambled, made prostitution, told lies, made slander, spent their time plundering, worshipped idols, and unconditionally accepted and shared other values with society. Their contravening these expectations unites all our views and interpretations on one point. Actually, these people did not outwardly doubt what they did and their values. However, the fact that they described someone like Muhammad as <em>“Amin,”</em> someone who did not live like them, who had a different lifestyle, and who brought different values to society is important in respect to showing the “<strong>sub-conscious</strong>” doubts, suspicions and uncertainty about their actions, behavior and the values they shared up to that time. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">The path followed and method adopted by Islamic civilization from the time of the first revelation always had the goal of helping to bring to the surface the existing doubts and uncertainties these people had in regard to the things they did and the values they developed. The point sought on this road adopted by Islamic civilization was to help the “idea of truth,” which nourished the sub-conscious doubts and suspicions about the actions and behavior of these people, become conscious. It gave the people a chance to rescue themselves from the old, mistaken conditioning the society had engraved in them. </span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">In the period before Islam, the fact that these people called Muhammad <em>“Amin”</em> even though he did not live like them and brought different values from their own shows two perspectives and, consequently, leads us to two important points: </span></span></p><p> </p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">Even if outwardly these people saw all they did and the values they held as ultimate truths, they actually had sub-conscious doubts about the truth of them. They were not convinced that they were right. In this situation these people had found what was “wrong.” They must have asked themselves the question, “what is wrong?” </span></span></li> </ul><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">Their ability to define what was wrong would legitimize the fact that they “knew what was right.” For this reason, these people must have asked themselves the question, “what is right?” They must have had at least the nucleus of an idea of what is right. Otherwise, this “idea” that crystallized as the whole of Muhammad’s actions and behavior would not have been immediately accepted, approved and respected. They would not have loved him as much as they did and would not have seen and shown him as an “ideal person” to the degree they did. </span></span></li> </ul><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'"><span style="font-size: 15px">They called him <strong>Muhammadul-amin</strong>. I wonder, did the idea of “right” help these people define what was wrong, or did what was wrong lead to the idea of right in their minds? Of course, we prefer the first alternative. Only the idea of right could help them define what was wrong; whereas, their mistakes (what was wrong) would lead them to further mistakes. </span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="genc_kalem, post: 180637, member: 15919"] [b]The ideal human type in a society of ignorance: Muhammad al-amin[/b] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=5][COLOR=red][B]THE IDEAL HUMAN TYPE IN A SOCIETY OF IGNORANCE: MUHAMMAD AL-AMIN [/B][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT] [COLOR=#666666][B][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=teal][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/B][/COLOR] [COLOR=#666666][B][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=teal][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/B][/COLOR] [COLOR=#666666][B][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=teal][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/B][/COLOR] [COLOR=#666666][B][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=teal][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/B][/COLOR] [COLOR=#666666][B][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=teal][/COLOR][/SIZE][/FONT][/B][/COLOR] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][COLOR=#666666][B][COLOR=teal]Ali Murat Daryal, PhD[/COLOR][/B] [/COLOR] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][IMG]http://www.lastprophet.info/en/images/stories/kimdir/daryal_150.jpg[/IMG] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]After Muhammad (pbuh) became an active member of the society where he passed his childhood, he began to be uncertain about everything in the society. These doubts prevented him from accepting all the customs and behavior in that society which had been passed down from generation to generation and applying them in his own life. In this situation Muhammad adopted an attitude of organizing his life according to the truths he had discovered through common sense and intuition and to develop relationships with others along these same lines. This action and behavior of his were the first propagation of Islam not officially based on revelation. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]Of course, it could not be expected that this action and behavior would have an impact on the dominant patterns of behavior accustomed to in the society. However, it would not be reflecting reality to say that there was no influence at all on the patterns of behavior that had been followed until that time. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]The behavior Muhammad displayed in front of everyone brought new dimensions to such concepts as “life, man, freedom, rights, justice, equality, truthfulness and work.” It inspired new ideas in their minds regarding how some other similar concepts could, in fact, should be understood. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]Muhammad joined society as one of its members. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]However, the people in society at that time were extremely determined to adhere to the patterns of behavior they had inherited from their fathers and grandfathers and to share and live their values. They had an uncompromising stance on the transmission of these to their children. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]In spite of all this, the people used the attribute [I]“amin”[/I] for Muhammad, who did not accept their actions and behavior, did not share their values, and, to the contrary, suggested new values; they called him “[B]Muhammadul-Amin.[/B]” [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]However, we would expect that these people would give this attribute to someone who had best represented them by taking a non-compromising attitude regarding their actions and behavior, sharing and perpetuating their values and having the determination to transmit them to future generations. The fact that they saw someone who rejected their values and brought new ones to society as worthy of this attribute instead of someone who shared their values and spent his life to protect them is a matter that needs to be dwelt upon carefully. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]Muhammad was an orphan. He had no authority behind him. But still the society called him [I]“Amin.”[/I] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]The wealthy thought of this term in respect to trade. They understood that Muhammad was extremely trustworthy in trade and other financial relationships. For this reason, they called him [I]“Amin.”[/I] [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]The nobility were concerned about their honor and dignity. They understood from this term that Muhammad would respect their honor, dignity, and prestige. By using [I]“Amin”[/I] they wanted to show that he would not damage their honor by means of lying, slander, falsehood and gossip. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]Those in governing positions in society –from the nobility, of course- gave this term a different meaning. They saw his existence as a guarantee against friction among classes and conflict among tribes. With this term, they wanted to show that they did not nurture doubts about his role as mediator and judge in society and his positive attitude regarding events. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]Fighters and warriors naturally gave a different meaning and interpretation to this term. With this name, they understood that Muhammad was reliable in battle and that he would not abandon the battle lines under any circumstances that might appear. They wanted to demonstrate this to everyone –friends and foes alike. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]The socially, economically and physically weak gave a meaning to this term appropriate to themselves. They gave it dimensions according to their own state and conditions. They wanted to show that they had no doubt about his ability to help them in every possible way when they came to him for financial aid and other needs and, in fact, that they believed he would ask for help from friends and serve as guarantor for it. The poor looked at this name from their own perspective of helplessness. These people wanted to demonstrate with the term “Amin” that they believed and felt certain when they encountered oppression, regardless of from whom, that Muhammad would protect their rights under all circumstances. Orphans wanted to make clear that when they sought his protection, they were sure he would open his arms to them as a brother or father and that they would live without fear because of him. In a world where everyone beat, cursed and looked down upon them, slaves understood by this name that he would not beat, curse, look down upon or speak badly to them. They wanted to explain their belief that in a society where no one considered them as human beings, he saw each of them as an honorable person and would treat them accordingly. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]Rightly so, these people could only have been expected to describe someone as [I]“Amin”[/I] who had a lifestyle like their fathers and grandfathers and themselves and who drank alcohol, gambled, made prostitution, told lies, made slander, spent their time plundering, worshipped idols, and unconditionally accepted and shared other values with society. Their contravening these expectations unites all our views and interpretations on one point. Actually, these people did not outwardly doubt what they did and their values. However, the fact that they described someone like Muhammad as [I]“Amin,”[/I] someone who did not live like them, who had a different lifestyle, and who brought different values to society is important in respect to showing the “[B]sub-conscious[/B]” doubts, suspicions and uncertainty about their actions, behavior and the values they shared up to that time. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]The path followed and method adopted by Islamic civilization from the time of the first revelation always had the goal of helping to bring to the surface the existing doubts and uncertainties these people had in regard to the things they did and the values they developed. The point sought on this road adopted by Islamic civilization was to help the “idea of truth,” which nourished the sub-conscious doubts and suspicions about the actions and behavior of these people, become conscious. It gave the people a chance to rescue themselves from the old, mistaken conditioning the society had engraved in them. [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]In the period before Islam, the fact that these people called Muhammad [I]“Amin”[/I] even though he did not live like them and brought different values from their own shows two perspectives and, consequently, leads us to two important points: [/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [LIST] [*][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]Even if outwardly these people saw all they did and the values they held as ultimate truths, they actually had sub-conscious doubts about the truth of them. They were not convinced that they were right. In this situation these people had found what was “wrong.” They must have asked themselves the question, “what is wrong?” [/SIZE][/FONT] [/LIST][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [LIST] [*][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]Their ability to define what was wrong would legitimize the fact that they “knew what was right.” For this reason, these people must have asked themselves the question, “what is right?” They must have had at least the nucleus of an idea of what is right. Otherwise, this “idea” that crystallized as the whole of Muhammad’s actions and behavior would not have been immediately accepted, approved and respected. They would not have loved him as much as they did and would not have seen and shown him as an “ideal person” to the degree they did. [/SIZE][/FONT] [/LIST][FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=4]They called him [B]Muhammadul-amin[/B]. I wonder, did the idea of “right” help these people define what was wrong, or did what was wrong lead to the idea of right in their minds? Of course, we prefer the first alternative. Only the idea of right could help them define what was wrong; whereas, their mistakes (what was wrong) would lead them to further mistakes. [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Adı
İnsan doğrulaması
Peygamber Efendimiz a.s.v.'ın kabri nerededir? (Sadece şehir adını küçük harfler ile giriniz)
Cevap yaz
Forumlar
Islamic Forum in Different Languages
English Islamic Forum
The Prophet Mohammad (pbuh)
As a Human Prophet Muhammad ( p.b.u.h )
Bu site çerezler kullanır. Bu siteyi kullanmaya devam ederek çerez kullanımımızı kabul etmiş olursunuz.
Accept
Daha fazla bilgi edin.…
Üst